Will’s Blog for First Time Buyers

Renovation step by step process

July 14, 2008 · No Comments

Application Process

This describes a typical step-by-step application/mortgage origination process for a 203 (k)transaction involving the purchase and rehabilitation of a property.My role as a lender, the contractor, the borrower, consultant, the plan reviewer, appraiser and the inspector.

A. Lender Prepares Firm Commitment Application. The borrower provides information for the lender to request a credit report, verifications of employment and deposits, and any other source documents needed to establish the ability of the borrower to repay the mortgage.

B. Lender Issues Firm Commitment. If the application is found acceptable, the firm commitment is issued to the borrower. It states the maximum mortgage amount that HUD will insure for the borrower and the property.

C. Homebuyer Locates the Property.

D. Preliminary Feasibility Analysis. After the property is located, the homebuyer and their real estate professional should make a marketability analysis prior to signing the sales contract. The following should be determined:

  1.  
      1) The extent of the rehabilitation work required;

      2) Rough cost estimate of the work; and

      3) The expected market value of the property after completion of the work. Note: The borrower does not want to spend money for appraisals and repair specifications (plans), then discover that the value of the property will be less than the purchase price (or existing indebtedness), plus the cost of improvements.

  2. E. Sales Contract is Executed. A provision should be included in the sales contract that the buyer has applied for Section 203(k) financing.

    F. Homebuyer Prepares Work Write-up and Cost Estimate. A consultant can help the buyer prepare the exhibits to speed up the loan process. If a plan reviewer is the consultant, item G can be skipped and the exhibits can go directly to the appraisal stage.

    G. Lender Requests HUD Case Number. Upon acceptance of the architectural exhibits, I, the lender requests the assignment of a HUD case number, the plan reviewer, appraiser, and the inspector.

    H. Plan Reviewer Visits Property. The homebuyer and contractor (where applicable) meet with the plan reviewer to ensure that the architectural exhibits are acceptable and that all program requirements have been properly shown on the exhibits.

    I. Appraiser Performs the Appraisal.

    J. Lender Reviews the Application The appraisal is reviewed to determine the maximum insurable mortgage amount for the property

    K. Issuance of Conditional Commitment/Statement of Appraised Value. This is issued by the lender and establishes the maximum insurable mortgage amount for the property.

    L. Lender Issues Firm Commitment. If the application is found acceptable, the firm commitment is issued to the borrower. It states the maximum mortgage amount that HUD will insure for the borrower and the property.

    M. Mortgage Loan Closing. After issuance of the firm commitment, the lender prepares for the closing of the mortgage. This includes the preparation of the Rehabilitation Loan Agreement. The Agreement is executed by the borrower and the lender in order to establish the conditions under which the lender will release funds from the Rehabilitation Escrow Account. Following closing, the borrower is required to begin making mortgage payments on the entire principal amount for the mortgage, including the amount in the Rehabilitation Escrow Account that has not yet been disbursed.

    N. Mortgage Insurance Endorsement. Following loan closing, the lender submits copies of the mortgage documents to the HUD office for mortgage insurance endorsement. HUD reviews the submission and, if found acceptable, issues a Mortgage Insurance Certificate to the lender.

    O. Rehabilitation Construction Begins. At loan closing, the mortgage proceeds will be disbursed to pay off the seller of the existing property and the Rehabilitation Escrow Account will be established. Construction may begin. The homeowner has up to six (6) months to complete the work depending on the extent of work to be completed. (Lenders may require less than six months.)

    P. Releases from Rehabilitation Escrow Account. As construction progresses, funds are released after the work is inspected by a HUD-approved inspector. A maximum of four draw inspections plus a final inspection are allowed. The inspector reviews the Draw Request (form HUD-9746-A) that is prepared by the borrower and contractor. If the cost of rehabilitation exceeds $10,000, additional draw inspections are authorized provided the lender and borrower agree in writing and the number of draw inspections is shown on form HUD-92700, 203(k) Maximum Mortgage Worksheet.

    Q. Completion of Work/Final Inspection. When all work is complete according to the approved architectural exhibits and change orders, the borrower provides a letter indicating that all work is satisfactorily complete and ready for final inspection. If the HUD-approved inspector agrees, the final draw may be released, minus the required 10 percent holdback. If there is unused contingency funds or mortgage payment reserves in the Account, the lender must apply the funds to prepay the mortgage principal.

→ No CommentsCategories: First Time Home Buyer · General Industry News · renovation loan
Tagged: , , ,

What is FHA 203(k)?

July 14, 2008 · No Comments

Renovation: FHA 203(k) Renovation Loan:


An important tool for community and neighborhood revitalization, the FHA 203(k) loan offers flexible qualifying and low down payments:

  • FHA down payment (3%)
  • Flexible credit qualifying
  • Finance up to 6 months of mortgage payments
  • Purchase or Refinance and Improve all in one loan

The 203(k) loan program offers borrowers the resources to rehabilitate a home that may be in need of repair, either the home that they currently live in, or  a fixer-upper. One single loan is used to pay for the purchase (or refinance) and the cost of renovating the home.

. The FHA 203(k) loan is available to borrowers of all income levels, to homeowners who plan to OCCUPY the house, and the home is 1 to 4 units.

  • 203K Eligible Borrowers:
    • Owner Occupants - Purchase - Refinance

    Eligible Properties:

    • Single family dwellings
    • Condominium
    • Townhouse
    • Mixed Use (Storefront)
    • 1-4 Unit buildings- This loan can be used to increase or decrease the number of units.(  For example if you have a 2 family building that you want to convert to a large one family, the costs involved can be part of the loan. )
  • Structural Alteration and Reconstruction:
    • Elimination of health/safety hazards
    • Changes for cosmetic appeal
    • Plumbing, heating air conditioning, and electrical upgrades
    • Well and/or septic repairs
    • Roofing, gutters and downspouts
    • Flooring, tiling and carpeting
    • Energy conservation improvements

     

Access for the disabled

  • Appraisal:  The loan to value (also known as LTV ) is based on estimated value after agreed upon repairs are completed.)
    The appraiser will be given a copy of your “work-write up” to estimate an after improved value for your new home or current home. The loan given is  against that improved value  giving you credit for the work to be performed.Other Eligible Costs:
    (THESE COSTS MAY BE FINANCED INTO THE MORTGAGE LOAN)

    • Contingency reserve (10%-20%) ( What is a contingency reserve-Most mortgages for purchase-renovation require an additional 10 percent of the total cost of the project to be put aside into a reserve account. This contingency reserve is only used when unforeseen repairs or costs are found during renovation.)
    • Up to 6 months PITI (Principal ,Interest ,Taxes and Insurance)mortgage payments
    • Permit costs
    • Consultant fees
    • Inspection and title update fees
    • Architectural & Engineering fees (if needed)
  • What Steps Do  you need to take to  Buy a House Using FHA 203(k) Renovation Loan.
  •  
    •   As with any Prospective Purchase Your First Step should be to speak to a Mortgage Professional
    • Locate the home you want and submit a contract for purchase - contingent on a home inspection.
    • After your contract is signed, schedule a home inspection with a 203(k) cost consultant to budget your renovation.
    • If you approve the budget, the 203(k) cost consultant will prepare the work write up for the appraiser and lender, and will prepare three contractor bid packages for you.
    • You can now bid your job to general contractors, or multiple sub-contractors.
    • Appraiser uses work write-up to value home as if all work is completed.
    • Loan closing (30 to 45 days average).
    • Within 30 days of closing start project with general contractor, or multiple sub-contractors.

Please feel to contact me if you have any question or are looking to Purchase a Rehab. Home.

→ No CommentsCategories: First Time Home Buyer · General Industry News · renovation loan
Tagged: , , ,

Helping buyer with Collection on credit report

June 25, 2008 · No Comments

With the recent mortgage debacle and the subsequent tightening of available credit - it’s no wonder that more and more lenders, hospitals, and landlords are turning their focus to collections in an effort to recoup some of their losses.

In the past twelve months I’ve seen a drastic spike in consumer complaints about collection agencies and their strong-arm tactics. Unfortunately, with the current economic downswing and the constant murmurs of a recession looming ahead, it’s only going to get worse. You need to know how to help your clients avoid collections before they happen - and how to deal with them if they do.

Collections will have a serious negative impact on your client’s credit reports and credit scores. They are never good and should be avoided at all costs because they are next to impossible to get removed.

But before we delve into how to handle collections, let’s clarify what a collection is and how the system works. A collection is an action taken by a lender (or service provider) in an attempt to collect an unpaid or delinquent debt. Some lenders will use their own internal collection departments while others will outsource debts to a 3rd party collection agency.

Either way, the collector’s primary task is to convince debtors to pay up.

Collection agencies work with lenders and service providers in two different ways. The first way is for the agency to buy the bad debt so that they own it outright. In all cases collection agencies purchase these debts for much less than the amount owed - usually pennies on the dollar. Another option is for the lender to consign the account to the collection agency. With this option, the lender agrees to pay the agency a percentage of whatever amount their collectors are able to recover. This percentage can vary, of course, but I’ve seen as high as 50% in some cases.

Once the collection agency takes over the account, they give financial incentives to their agents by rewarding them with bonuses if they are able to collect most - or all - of the outstanding debt. The more the agent is able to collect, the more money they get to put in their own pockets. Unfortunately, this can lead to some pretty ruthless and unethical collection practices.

Avoiding collections before they happen:

The easiest way to avoid a collection is for your clients to pay their bills - and pay them on time. Sometimes this may mean laying aside their pride and paying a bill that they don’t necessarily agree with just to avoid it going into collections.

If they don’t agree with a charge or feel that they’ve been treated unfairly by a provider - utility company, cell phone company, doctor, dentist, etc. - withholding payment isn’t a wise option.  Eventually the service provider will turn the account over to a collector and when they report it in your client’s credit report; it will negatively impact their credit for up to seven years.

I can’t tell you how many times I’ve heard from disgruntled clients that refused to pay a bill ‘on principle’ and then ended up with a $72 collection on their credit reports. It’s just not worth the damage it causes. In the long run it’s just better for them if they bite the bullet and pay the bill.

When a collection is unavoidable:

We all know that life can throw your clients a curve ball when they least expect it - a job loss, death in the family, unforeseen illness, etc. In these cases, it may be impossible to avoid a collection. If they already have a collection, here are some very important things you should know about:

1. Fair Debt Collection Practices Act. Know their rights as outlined in the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act. If they have a collection and have been contacted by a collection agency, they only have 30 days to dispute the debt or to request the collector to validate the debt. They also have rights that protect them from harassing and unethical collectors. To read a summary of their rights, go to http://www.ftc.gov/os/statutes/fdcpajump.shtm.

2. Statute of Limitations. A lot of consumers confuse the credit reporting statute of limitations with the statute of limitations to collect a debt. In many cases the statue of limitations to sue for contract debt can be much longer than the debt can legally be reported to the credit bureaus. The debts are certainly still collectable, just not reportable. If they have a collection that is close to being removed because of the statute of limitations - 7 years - and they are able to pay it or settle it, have them do so. Collectors are suing to collect their funds more than ever and as I mentioned earlier, it’s only going to get worse.

3. Don’t ignore the collection! Recently I heard a very well known and highly respected consumer advocate celebrity advising people to ignore collectors if they don’t have the money to pay. This is probably the worst advice to follow when dealing with collections. Communication is vital. Avoiding collections does not make the collection or the bill collectors go away. In fact, the collection agency will most likely end up suing you if you owe them over $1,500, and possibly garnishing their wages or filing suit against them. Ignoring them won’t stop the process; it will only make it much worse and more expensive in the long run.

4. Paying “In Full” vs. Settling. I always advise clients to pay a collection, or at the very least to try settling with the collector. Remember, the collection agencies pay pennies on the dollar for these accounts. Your clients should try to negotiate and settle the debt for as little as possible. They can start by suggesting 20% of what they are asking and go up from there. Keep in mind that your clients are dealing with professional collectors. They’re going to push for them to pay it all up front rather than a payment plan because they want to get their commission sooner rather than later.  Don’t let them push your clients into something they can’t do - structure a deal that works for your clients, not for them. When they do come to an agreement, get it in writing before they make the payment. But always remember…they are not lenders. They don’t have to set your clients up with a payment plan. Their attitude is “hey, you already had your chance to make payments to the creditor and you screwed that up. So why should I trust you?”

5. Pay for removal. Some shady collectors will tell your clients whatever they want to hear if they think it will help them get them to pay the debt. If they offer to remove the collection from your client’s credit reports in exchange for payment, they shouldn’t believe it unless they get it in writing first.

The credit bureaus have strict policies regarding collections. The only way a collection will be removed is if it is an error or if the statute of limitations for reporting has expired. Think about it this way, if the credit bureaus removed a collection just because it was paid, how accurate would their reporting system be? Did the collection exist? Absolutely! If they were to remove the collection it would dilute the value of their credit reports. This is why the credit bureaus will not honor those pay for removal deals. Don’t let your clients fall for it unless they have it in writing to back it up if the collector tries to renege on the deal.

To Summarize:

Your client’s best option is to avoid collections all together. However, if a collection is unavoidable, the next best thing is to minimize the damage by having them pay it or settle it as quickly as possible. Be sure to tell your clients to get everything in writing, including a receipt, and make sure that the collection agency updates the account as “paid” in their credit reports.

 

Visit us at  www.mycreditremedy.com

→ No CommentsCategories: Credit repair · First Time Home Buyer · General Industry News

Home Purchase Basics

June 18, 2008 · 1 Comment

 
Congratulations on your decision to buy a new home! There are many important things to consider throughout the process, especially if you’re a first-time homebuyer. Here’s some information that will keep you on track.

In General …
A home purchase may be the largest financial transaction in your lifetime, so it’s important to make the right decisions and to keep an eye on the details. With the assistance of your real estate agent and Loan Officer, it should be an efficient, pleasant, and ultimately rewarding experience.

Count on Your Real Estate Agent to:

  1. Preview available homes that suit your needs as you’ve defined them.
  2. Negotiate the best deal for you. Ask your loan officer for a pre-approval letter before submitting your offer. With a pre-approval letter from us in hand, your real estate agent will be able to demonstrate that you are a qualified and capable borrower. This may influence the seller, and may make the difference between the seller accepting your offer or someone else’s.

Count on me to:

  1. Help you understand the loan process and all of your loan options.
  2. Assist you in selecting a loan to meet your personal situation and goals.
  3. Provide you with a pre-approval letter.
  4. Keep you informed of your loan status throughout the entire process.

Make Sure You:

  1. Keep your real estate agent informed of any questions or concerns as they develop.
  2. Keep the process moving by providing documentation and decisions as soon as reasonably possible. By doing so, many of the details are taken care of early in the process so you can comfortably concentrate on any last-minute details or events that require your attention.
  3. Remain objective throughout the proces to ensure you making the business decisions related to your real estate transaction.
  4. Make sure you are pre-approved as early as possible. This will put the power of financing behind you so you can concentrate on selecting your home.

→ 1 CommentCategories: First Time Home Buyer · General Industry News · renovation loan
Tagged: ,

FHA LOAN NEWS - No more seasoning?

June 15, 2008 · No Comments

 

Press release from yesterday.  I copied this off the HUD.GOV website

  FHA EXTENDS FINANCING FOR IMMEDIATE PURCHASE OF FORECLOSED HOMES
Measure seen to bring stability to home values and accelerate sale of vacant properties

WASHINGTON - In an effort to stabilize declining home values in certain neighborhoods, the Bush Administration today announced a temporary policy that will extend government-backed mortgage insurance and allow for the immediate sale of vacant foreclosed properties.

For one year, the Federal Housing Administration (FHA) will insure foreclosed properties marketed and sold by property disposition firms on behalf of lenders. The properties, which must purchased by owner-occupants, will no longer be subject to the customary 90-day waiting period.

“A glut of foreclosed and abandoned homes harms neighborhoods, frustrates homebuyers and delays a community’s recovery,” said Brian D. Montgomery, Assistant Secretary of Housing-Federal Housing Commissioner. “The action we take today will allow homebuyers to purchase these homes in much greater numbers and ease the excess supply of unsold homes in neighborhoods across the country.”

FHA’s new temporary policy will help stabilize neighborhoods experiencing high rates of foreclosure by reducing the inventory of unsold properties. Many foreclosed properties remain vacant for months, inviting vandalism and reducing values of surrounding homes. To address that sizeable inventory, lenders have hired companies that specialize in the marketing and disposition of foreclosed homes. It’s reasonable and appropriate that these firms have the ability to sell the properties to borrowers using FHA financing.

With certain exceptions, FHA currently prohibits insuring a mortgage on a home owned by the seller for less than 90 days. This prohibition is intended to prevent property “flipping,” a predatory practice that strips a home of its equity before being quickly resold at an inflated price to an unsuspecting buyer. FHA’s new policy will permit the immediate sale of foreclosed properties to legitimate borrowers wishing to use FHA-insured financing.

To read the full text of this new temporary policy, visit FHA’s website.

  I don’t think it will apply to investors but it could be great news for us buying HUD houses - It will probably be thirty or more days before we know if it just applies only to Forecloses Homes and not to quick turns.  The way I read it it would not apply to us trying to quick turn properties.  I will try to get additional information from my contacts at PEMCO and HUD.  Have a great Father’s day weekend.  I will be back in town late Monday but as always - I have my cell phone.
 
Will

 

Beware - See anyone you know?

 

 

→ No CommentsCategories: First Time Home Buyer · General Industry News
Tagged:

Georgia Holds Second Highest Bankruptcy Rate

June 3, 2008 · No Comments

Georgia continues to be one of the top states for personal bankruptcy, as new reports indicate that the state ranked 2nd in the nation with just shy of 13,000 bankruptcies registered during the first quarter. The only state with more bankruptcies was Tennessee.

Georgia

Declaring bankruptcy is sometimes the only way for consumers and citizens to seek legal protection from creditors seeking to collect money that citizens simply don’t have, and in Georgia, roughly 1 out of 60 homeowners has sought this protection.

However, this is nothing new. Georgia has historically had one of the higher bankruptcy rates in the nation, and has rarely fallen out of the top 5 states in this category. Experts say that this is because the state attracts a lot of young entrepreneurs who attempt to go into business for themselves, and of course, some fail. This, combined with the state’s laws that make it easy for creditors to go after their debts contributes annually to one of the higher rates of bankruptcy out there.

The recent trend in foreclosures has also had a huge impact on personal bankruptcies, and Georgia is currently 8th among states in terms of foreclosure rate. Laws in Georgia also make it easy for lenders to pursue a foreclosure on indebted homeowners relatively quickly, as most homes in foreclosure end up being sold off within 40 days.

These are all signs of how deeply the housing market recession is affecting the economy, and the personal lives of so many borrowers and homeowners. Since they cannot gain anything by selling off their properties on the open market, many homeowners in Georgia seek pre-foreclosure sales to investors to rid themselves of the foreclosure, and instances of pre-foreclosure sales have been growing in the area.

→ No CommentsCategories: Credit repair · First Time Home Buyer · renovation loan

U.S. FORECLOSURE ACTIVITY INCREASES 23 PERCENT IN FIRST QUARTER

June 3, 2008 · No Comments

U.S. FORECLOSURE ACTIVITY INCREASES 23 PERCENT IN FIRST QUARTER
By RealtyTrac Staff   

 

Foreclosure Activity Up 112 Percent From Q1 2007
California and Florida Cities Account for 13 of Top 20 Metro Areas

IRVINE, Calif. – April 29, 2008 – RealtyTrac® (realtytrac.com), the leading online marketplace for foreclosure properties, today released its Q1 2008 U.S. Foreclosure Market Report™, which shows foreclosure filings — default notices, auction sale notices and bank repossessions — were reported on 649,917 properties during the first quarter, a 23 percent increase from the previous quarter and a 112 percent increase from the first quarter of 2007. The report also shows that one in every 194 U.S. households received a foreclosure filing during the quarter.

RealtyTrac publishes the largest and most comprehensive national database of foreclosure and bank-owned properties, with over 1 million properties from nearly 2,500 counties across the country, and is the foreclosure data provider to MSN Real Estate, Yahoo! Real Estate and The Wall Street Journal’s Real Estate Journal.

“Foreclosure activity in the first quarter increased on a year-over-year basis in 46 out of the 50 states and in 90 of the nation’s 100 largest metro areas, demonstrating that most regions of the country are seeing more foreclosures,” said James J. Saccacio, chief executive officer of RealtyTrac. “In some areas there are also some unusual, non-market factors impacting the foreclosure numbers. For example, the city of Philadelphia in late March issued a temporary moratorium on all foreclosure auctions for April, and the city has since adopted a program that will delay foreclosure proceedings on owner-occupied properties until the owners have met face-to-face with lenders to attempt a loan workout plan that would prevent foreclosure.

“While we’re hopeful that programs like those in Philadelphia will have a positive long-term impact, they could be simply deferring another flood of foreclosures,” Saccacio continued. “And that could extend the length of time it takes the market to recover from this downward cycle, in which we’ve already seen seven consecutive quarters of increasing foreclosure activity.”

Click to enlarge

Nevada, California, Arizona post top state foreclosure rates
One in every 54 Nevada households received a foreclosure filing during the first quarter, the highest foreclosure rate among the states and 3.6 times the national average. Foreclosure filings were reported on 19,595 Nevada properties during the quarter, up 3 percent from the previous quarter and up 137 percent from the first quarter of 2007.

Foreclosure filings were reported on 169,831 California properties during the first quarter, the highest total among the states and a rate of one in every 78 households — the nation’s second highest foreclosure rate. Foreclosure activity in California increased 32 percent from the previous quarter and was up nearly 213 percent from the first quarter of 2007.

Arizona documented the nation’s third highest state foreclosure rate, with one in every 95 households receiving a foreclosure filing during the quarter. Foreclosure filings were reported on 27,404 Arizona properties during the quarter, up 45 percent from the previous quarter and up nearly 245 percent from the first quarter of 2007.

Foreclosure filings were reported on 87,893 Florida properties during the first quarter, the second highest state total and giving Florida the nation’s fourth highest foreclosure rate — one in every 97 households received a foreclosure filing during the quarter. Foreclosure activity in the state was up 17 percent from the previous quarter and up 178 percent from the first quarter of 2007.

Colorado foreclosure activity increased 33 percent from the previous quarter and 78 percent from the first quarter of 2007, and the state’s foreclosure rate ranked No. 5 among the states. Foreclosure filings were reported on 18,996 Colorado properties during the quarter, a rate of one in every 110 households.

Other states with foreclosure rates among the top 10 were Georgia, Michigan, Ohio, Massachusetts and Connecticut.

Top 20 metro areas include Las Vegas, Detroit, Miami, Atlanta, Los Angeles
The Q1 2008 U.S. Foreclosure Market Report also ranks the nation’s 100 largest metropolitan areas by foreclosure rate. California and Florida metro areas accounted for 13 of the top 20 metro foreclosure rates, with the California cities of Stockton and Riverside-San Bernardino taking the No. 1 and No. 2 spots.

One in every 30 Stockton households received a foreclosure filing during the quarter — 6.6 times the national average — and one in every 38 Riverside-San Bernardino households received a foreclosure filing during the quarter — more than five times the national average. Other California metro areas in the top 20 included Bakersfield at No. 4, Sacramento at No. 5, San Diego at No. 9, Oakland at No. 10, Fresno at No. 12, Los Angeles at No. 17 and Orange County at No. 19.

Las Vegas documented the third highest metro foreclosure rate, with one in every 44 households receiving a foreclosure filing during the quarter. The metro area’s foreclosure activity increased 1 percent from the previous quarter and 134 percent from the first quarter of 2007.

Detroit foreclosure activity in the first quarter decreased 22 percent from the previous quarter and was down almost 4 percent from the first quarter of 2007, but the metro area’s foreclosure rate still ranked No. 6, with one in every 68 households receiving a foreclosure filing during the quarter. Phoenix foreclosure activity increased 46 percent from the previous quarter and 294 percent from the first quarter of 2007, and the metro area’s foreclosure rate ranked No. 7, with one in every 70 households receiving a foreclosure filing during the quarter.

The highest ranked Florida metro area was Fort Lauderdale, which ranked No. 8 with one in every 73 households receiving a foreclosure filing during the quarter. Other Florida metro areas in the top 20 included Orlando at No. 13, Miami at No. 14 and Sarasota-Bradenton-Venice at No. 15. The foreclosure rate in Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater ranked No. 21.

Other metro areas with foreclosure rates among the top 20 included Denver at No. 11, Atlanta at No. 16, Cleveland at No. 18  and Memphis, Tenn., at No. 20.

Report methodology
The RealtyTrac Monthly U.S. Foreclosure Market Report provides a count of the total number of properties with at least one foreclosure filing reported during the quarter — broken out by type of filing at the state and national level. Data is also available at the individual county level. RealtyTrac’s report incorporates documents filed in all three phases of foreclosure: Default — Notice of Default (NOD) and Lis Pendens (LIS); Auction — Notice of Trustee Sale and Notice of Foreclosure Sale (NTS and NFS); and Real Estate Owned, or REO properties (that have been foreclosed on and repurchased by a bank). If more than one foreclosure document is filed against a property during the quarter only the most recent filing is counted in the report. The report also checks if the same type of document was filed against a property in a previous quarter. If so, and if that previous filing occurred within the estimated foreclosure timeframe for the state the property is in, the report does not count the property in the current month.

 

U.S. Foreclosure Market Statistics by State – Q1 2008

    Properties with Foreclosure Filings    
Rate Rank State Name NOD LIS NTS NFS REO Total 1/every X HH (rate) %Change from Q4 07 %Change from Q1 07

United States

145,822

148,540

147,103

51,989

156,463

649,917

194

23.15

111.89

43

Alabama

5

0

890

0

805

1,700

1,241

0.12

8.21

31

Alaska

0

0

421

0

60

481

575

-12.39

72.40

3

Arizona

59

0

19,389

0

7,956

27,404

95

45.21

244.66

22

Arkansas

125

0

3,089

0

538

3,752

339

35.45

277.46

2

California

108,109

0

21,699

0

40,023

169,831

78

32.10

212.78

5

Colorado

99

0

11,875

0

7,022

18,996

110

32.71

77.98

10

Connecticut

0

6,209

0

1,124

299

7,632

188

183.51

303.17*

32

Delaware

0

23

0

364

150

537

713

172.59*

87.76*

 

District of Columbia

15

0

847

0

227

1,089

260

195.12

7160.00*

4

Florida

11

66,278

1

11,418

10,185

87,893

97

17.11

178.12

6

Georgia

100

0

20,138

0

8,265

28,503

136

22.54

79.94

44

Hawaii

51

0

307

0

13

371

1,348

18.15

109.60

23

Idaho

836

0

849

0

125

1,810

340

20.03

163.85

14

Illinois

0

18,795

0

204

4,216

23,215

224

-1.13

53.51

11

Indiana

0

4,900

0

4,590

4,446

13,936

198

32.11

85.52

34

Iowa

54

0

696

0

816

1,566

843

24.98

28.47

35

Kansas

0

308

0

773

315

1,396

865

45.57

52.40

42

Kentucky

0

333

0

704

545

1,582

1,194

31.18

-9.34

37

Louisiana

0

29

0

1,644

265

1,938

944

70.15

31.12

41

Maine

264

0

296

0

27

587

1,177

243.27*

2074.07*

12

Maryland

0

4,152

0

6,420

821

11,393

202

26.69

504.08*

9

Mass.

0

9,461

0

6,785

120

16,366

166

263.04

259.93

7

Michigan

3,027

0

14,501

0

12,016

29,544

153

-8.76

24.34

29

Minnesota

73

0

2,743

0

1,415

4,231

540

10.35

72.27

46

Mississippi

6

0

280

0

172

458

2,711

-7.66

65.94

20

Missouri

1,733

0

3,333

0

3,777

8,843

297

0.57

46.48

39

Montana

6

0

389

0

26

421

1,026

6.58

40.33

40

Nebraska

0

30

0

612

100

742

1,044

-40.31

-24.21

1

Nevada

13,424

0

2,064

0

4,107

19,595

54

3.49

137.14

21

New Hampshire

2

0

1,162

0

624

1,788

330

221.01*

2880.00*

16

New Jersey

0

9,703

0

2,284

1,117

13,104

265

34.32

66.00

33

New Mexico

1

1,034

0

9

138

1,182

719

16.91

39.06

30

New York

0

10,319

0

2,145

1,913

14,377

550

14.31

40.28

25

North Carolina

7,408

0

258

0

2,617

10,283

392

3.40

25.94

49

North Dakota

0

0

0

1

49

50

6,156

-26.47

-20.63

8

Ohio

0

12,773

12

8,168

10,299

31,252

161

-7.15

62.17

28

Oklahoma

1,024

0

1,212

0

1,003

3,239

496

22.27

11.15

24

Oregon

2,730

0

1,081

0

391

4,202

378

34.68

121.62

36

Pennsylvania

0

833

1

3,323

1,744

5,901

924

7.62

-24.37

19

Rhode Island

2

0

1,564

0

15

1,581

284

179.33*

621.92*

38

South Carolina

0

448

0

169

1,322

1,939

1,019

61.99

87.71*

47

South Dakota

0

0

0

62

2

64

5,513

6300.00*

2033.33*

13

Tennessee

3,271

0

4,585

0

4,533

12,389

216

41.38

72.21

17

Texas

386

0

18,373

0

14,935

33,694

274

17.77

28.75

18

Utah

492

0

2,443

0

354

3,289

274

32.62

77.59

50

Vermont

1

0

2

0

0

3

103,186

-66.67

0.00*

15

Virginia

2,389

0

7,123

0

3,639

13,151

246

65.53

525.64*

26

Washington

55

0

5,354

0

1,229

6,638

407

14.23

62.18

48

West Virginia

1

0

115

0

27

143

6,138

70.24

37.50

27

Wisconsin

0

2,912

5

1,190

1,565

5,672

447

17.82

194.50

45

Wyoming

63

0

6

0

95

164

1,458

17.99

137.68*

 

Rate Rank State Metro Name Props with Filings 1/every X HH (rate) %Change from Q4 07 %Change from Q1 07

  U.S. Total

649,917

194

23.15

111.89

1

CA STOCKTON

7,560

             30

17.14

291.91

2

CA RIVERSIDE/SAN BERNARDINO

37,239

             38

39.13

230.81

3

NV LAS VEGAS/PARADISE

17,320

             44

1.34

134.40

4

CA BAKERSFIELD

5,113

             51

29.31

226.08

5

CA SACRAMENTO

13,967

             55

14.46

134.62

6

MI DETROIT/LIVONIA/DEARBORN

12,402

             68

-22.01

-3.67

7

AZ PHOENIX/MESA

23,135

             70

46.33

294.06

8

FL FORT LAUDERDALE

10,926

             73

15.29

205.79

9

CA SAN DIEGO

15,315

             74

48.36

251.50

10

CA OAKLAND

12,666

             75

13.34

222.87

11

CO DENVER/AURORA

13,368

             77

36.79

85.69

12

CA FRESNO

3,812

             79

16.79

176.03

13

FL ORLANDO

10,522

             81

48.03

248.87

14

FL MIAMI

11,703

             81

-2.86

153.37

15

FL SARASOTA/BRADENTON/VENICE

4,299

             89

13.94

275.79

16

GA ATLANTA/SANDY SPRINGS/MARIETTA

22,554

             91

13.71

68.70

17

CA LOS ANGELES/LONG BEACH

32,177

           104

45.47

203.61

18

OH CLEVELAND/LORAIN/ELYRIA/MENTOR

8,969

           105

-7.11

49.56

19

CA ORANGE

9,591

           107

56.36

268.18

20

TN-MS-AR MEMPHIS

4,955

           108

22.89

51.11

21

FL TAMPA/ST PETERSBURG/CLEARWATER

11,811

           110

9.61

127.05

22

DC-MD-VA-WV WASHINGTON/ARLINGTON/ALEXANDRIA

15,108

           112

56.46*

546.19*

23

CA VENTURA

2,360

           115

37.85

109.96

24

IN INDIANAPOLIS

6,330

           116

17.20

35.55

25

MA ESSEX

2,376

           125

319.05

331.22

26

MA WORCHESTER

2,514

           125

190.64

183.75

27

FL JACKSONVILLE

4,557

           125

26.90

64.16

28

CA SAN JOSE/SUNNYVALE/SANTA CLARA

4,745

           132

37.46

260.56

29

MI WARREN/FARMINGTON HILLS/TROY

7,944

           133

4.90

47.80

30

FL PALM BEACH

4,739

           133

-8.92

123.43

31

OH DAYTON

2,720

           139

-20.16

69.05

32

OH COLUMBUS

5,338

           144

-4.46

53.92

33

MA SPRINGFIELD

1,921

           147

329.75

226.15

34

OH AKRON

2,069

           148

-24.05

50.25

35

CT NEWHAVEN/MILFORD

2,298

           152

158.78

328.73*

36

MA BOSTON/QUINCY

4,783

           157

278.10

325.53

37

OH TOLEDO

1,877

           159

-33.89

38.52

38

IN GARY

1,790

           159

93.30

176.23

39

TX FORT WORTH/ARLINGTON

4,599

           167

4.43

11.90

40

TX HOUSTON/BAYTOWN/SUGARLAND

12,468

           168

41.78

58.85

41

IL LAKE/KENOSHA

1,485

           169

10.24

72.88

42

IL CHICAGO

17,602

           176

-5.54

48.20

43

MO-IL ST LOUIS

6,625

           185

14.50

79.49

44

TX DALLAS

8,337

           185

-1.88

6.37

45

CT BRIDGEPORT/STAMFORD/NORWALK

1,878

           186

226.61

359.17*

46

OH-KY-IN CINCINNATI

4,845

           187

12.49

61.93

47

NJ NEWARK

4,323

           195

39.95

167.51

48

WA TACOMA

1,514

           204

15.05

79.60

49

MD BETHESDA/FREDERICK/GAITHERSBURG

2,147

           207

46.25

658.66*

50

WI MILWAUKEE/WAUKESHA/WST ALLIS

3,050

           213

1.33

203.48

51

CT HARTFORD

2,285

           214

184.91

247.79*

52

MA CAMBRIDGE/NEWTON/FRAMINGHAM

2,732

           216

225.24

275.27

53

NC-SC CHARLOTTE/GASTONIA

3,098

           219

-1.05

0.75

54

AZ TUCSON

1,864

           224

14.50

90.20

55

AR LITTLE ROCK/NORTH LITTLE ROCK

1,285

           226

14.53

141.54

56

TN NASHVILLE/DAVIDSON

2,608

           240

46.52

93.76

57

NJ CAMDEN

1,134

           248

7.59

25.72

58

UT SALT LAKE CITY

1,509

           255

22.58

69.36

59

MO-KS KANSAS CITY

3,362

           259

-9.45

14.08

60

MD BALTIMORE/TOWSON

4,218

           261

19.42

435.28*

61

TX SAN ANTONIO

2,599

           284

1.68

9.02

62

RI PROVIDENCE/NEW BEDFORD

1,581

           284

179.33

621.92*

63

NC GREENSBORO/HIGHPOINT

1,057

           289

-8.48

43.61

64

TN KNOXVILLE

1,041

           291

63.94

182.88

65

NC RALEIGH/CARY

1,397

           293

-1.34

23.85

66

OK OKLAHOMA CITY

1,725

           298

40.02

13.64

67

NY SUFFOLK/NASSAU

3,352

           299

21.80

8.69

68

OK TULSA

1,251

           314

-0.48

1.54

69

OR-WA PORTLAND/VANCOUVER/BEAVERTON

2,678

           326

41.02

148.42

70

MN-WI MINNEAPOLIS/ST PAUL/BLOOMINGTON

3,980

           329

12.14

71.11

71

CA SAN FRANCISCO

2,163

           338

17.43

154.17

72

NJ EDISON

2,688

           346

18.21

-3.97

73

TX AUSTIN/ROUND ROCK

1,664

           369

8.26

4.79

74

NM ALBUQUERQUE

913

           380

16.31

33.87

75

LA NEW ORLEANS

1,142

           393

53.49

33.88

76

VA RICHMOND

1,182

           425

206.22

1341.46*

77

DE-MD-NJ WILMINGTON

635

           438

112.37

155.02

78

NY ROCHESTER

988

           446

-11.15

8.45

79

TX MCALLEN/EDINBURG/PHARR

527

           455

575.64

997.92

80

NY-NJ NEW YORK/WAYNE/WHITE PLAINS

8,738

           503

10.94

66.57

81

WA SEATTLE/BELLEVUE/EVERETT

2,078

           517

7.78

40.98

82

PA PHILADELPHIA

3,064

           527

17.21

-29.64

83

KY-IN LOUISVILLE

995

           542

18.59

-7.53

84

VA-NC NORFOLK/VIRGINIA BEACH/NEWPORT NEWS

1,095

           544

21.80

365.96*

85

SC COLUMBIA

550

           552

120.00

170.94

86

NY ALBANY/SCHENECTADY/TROY

608

           622

147.15

447.75

87

PA PITTSBURGH

1,662

           664

-9.13

-4.59

88

NE-IA OMAHA/COUNCIL BLUFFS

504

           686

-51.59

-42.73

89

SC GREENVILLE

381

           693

710.64

504.76*

90

KS WICHITA

351

           727

35.00

50.00

91

NY POUGHKEEPSIE/NEWBURGH/MIDDLETOWN

327

           748

28.74

57.21

92

SC CHARLESTON

360

           761

27.66

70.62*

93

NY BUFFALO/CHEEKTOWAGA/TONAWANDA

677

           768

44.04

2.73

94

LA BATON ROUGE

351

           889

40.96

31.46

95

NY SYRACUSE

313

           909

99.36

184.55

96

TX EL PASO

246

        1,013

-10.55

-51.95

97

AL BIRMINGHAM/HOOVER

386

        1,187

-24.02

-48.87

98

PA SCRANTON/WILKES/BARRE/HAZLETON

167

        1,542

-29.54

-43.20

99

HI HONOLULU

155

        2,147

1.31

51.96

100

PA ALLENTOWN/BETHLEHEM/EASTON

25

      12,328

-66.22

-61.54

*Actual increase may not be as high due to data collection changes or improvements 

About RealtyTrac Inc.
Ranked as the third largest real estate site by MediaMetrix and No. 53 on Inc. magazine’s 2006 Inc. 500 list of the nation’s fastest-growing private companies, RealtyTrac Inc. (realtytrac.com), is the leading online marketplace for foreclosure properties, providing all the resources that home seekers, investors and real estate agents need to locate, evaluate and buy properties below market value.

Founded in 1996, RealtyTrac publishes the largest and most comprehensive national database of pre-foreclosure, foreclosure, For Sale By Owner, resale and new homes, with more than 1 million properties across the country, property reports, productivity tools and extensive professional resources. RealtyTrac hosts nearly 3 million unique visitors monthly and has been chosen to supply foreclosure data to MSN Real Estate, Yahoo! Real Estate and The Wall Street Journal’s Real Estate Journal. For current news and information regarding foreclosure-related issues and trends, visit our blog at www.ForeclosurePulse.com.

###

→ No CommentsCategories: First Time Home Buyer · General Industry News · renovation loan
Tagged: , ,

Foreclosures Increase by 112 Percent

May 31, 2008 · No Comments

 IRVINE, CA - RealtyTrac® released its Q1 2008 U.S. Foreclosure Market Report™, which shows foreclosure filings — default notices, auction sale notices and bank repossessions — were reported on 649,917 properties during the first quarter, a 23 percent increase from the previous quarter and a 112 percent increase from the first quarter of 2007. The report also shows that one in every 194 U.S. households received a foreclosure filing during the quarter.

“Foreclosure activity in the first quarter increased on a year-over-year basis in 46 out of the 50 states and in 90 of the nation’s 100 largest metro areas, demonstrating that most regions of the country are seeing more foreclosures,” said James J. Saccacio, chief executive officer of RealtyTrac. “In some areas there are also some unusual, non-market factors impacting the foreclosure numbers. For example, the city of Philadelphia in late March issued a temporary moratorium on all foreclosure auctions for April, and the city has since adopted a program that will delay foreclosure proceedings on owner-occupied properties until the owners have met face-to-face with lenders to attempt a loan workout plan that would prevent foreclosure.

“While we’re hopeful that programs like those in Philadelphia will have a positive long-term impact, they could be simply deferring another flood of foreclosures,” Saccacio continued. “And that could extend the length of time it takes the market to recover from this downward cycle, in which we’ve already seen seven consecutive quarters of increasing foreclosure activity.”

Nevada, California, Arizona post top state foreclosure rates
One in every 54 Nevada households received a foreclosure filing during the first quarter, the highest foreclosure rate among the states and 3.6 times the national average. Foreclosure filings were reported on 19,595 Nevada properties during the quarter, up 3 percent from the previous quarter and up 137 percent from the first quarter of 2007.

Foreclosure filings were reported on 169,831 California properties during the first quarter, the highest total among the states and a rate of one in every 78 households — the nation’s second highest foreclosure rate. Foreclosure activity in California increased 32 percent from the previous quarter and was up nearly 213 percent from the first quarter of 2007.

Arizona documented the nation’s third highest state foreclosure rate, with one in every 95 households receiving a foreclosure filing during the quarter. Foreclosure filings were reported on 27,404 Arizona properties during the quarter, up 45 percent from the previous quarter and up nearly 245 percent from the first quarter of 2007.

Foreclosure filings were reported on 87,893 Florida properties during the first quarter, the second highest state total and giving Florida the nation’s fourth highest foreclosure rate — one in every 97 households received a foreclosure filing during the quarter. Foreclosure activity in the state was up 17 percent from the previous quarter and up 178 percent from the first quarter of 2007.

Colorado foreclosure activity increased 33 percent from the previous quarter and 78 percent from the first quarter of 2007, and the state’s foreclosure rate ranked No. 5 among the states. Foreclosure filings were reported on 18,996 Colorado properties during the quarter, a rate of one in every 110 households.

Other states with foreclosure rates among the top 10 were Georgia, Michigan, Ohio, Massachusetts and Connecticut.

Top 20 metro areas include Las Vegas, Detroit, Miami, Atlanta, Los Angeles
The Q1 2008 U.S. Foreclosure Market Report also ranks the nation’s 100 largest metropolitan areas by foreclosure rate. California and Florida metro areas accounted for 13 of the top 20 metro foreclosure rates, with the California cities of Stockton and Riverside-San Bernardino taking the No. 1 and No. 2 spots.

One in every 30 Stockton households received a foreclosure filing during the quarter — 6.6 times the national average — and one in every 38 Riverside-San Bernardino households received a foreclosure filing during the quarter — more than five times the national average. Other California metro areas in the top 20 included Bakersfield at No. 4, Sacramento at No. 5, San Diego at No. 9, Oakland at No. 10, Fresno at No. 12, Los Angeles at No. 17 and Orange County at No. 19.

Las Vegas documented the third highest metro foreclosure rate, with one in every 44 households receiving a foreclosure filing during the quarter. The metro area’s foreclosure activity increased 1 percent from the previous quarter and 134 percent from the first quarter of 2007.

Detroit foreclosure activity in the first quarter decreased 22 percent from the previous quarter and was down almost 4 percent from the first quarter of 2007, but the metro area’s foreclosure rate still ranked No. 6, with one in every 68 households receiving a foreclosure filing during the quarter. Phoenix foreclosure activity increased 46 percent from the previous quarter and 294 percent from the first quarter of 2007, and the metro area’s foreclosure rate ranked No. 7, with on